.
.
.
.
As of March 8, 2026, President Donald Trump's approval rating has dipped, with polling averages placing him in the high 30s to low 40s, influenced by rising tensions in the Middle East.
(The Economist +2)
- Key polling data and averages around this date include:The Economist/YouGov (March 8, 2026): 38% approve, 58% disapprove, with a net rating of -19.
- Silver Bulletin Average (March 7, 2026): -13.0 net approval (41.9% approve vs 54.7% disapprove).
- Daily Mail/J.L. Partners (March 5-6, 2026): 44% approve, following a dip attributed to the conflict with Iran.
- Reuters/Ipsos (March 7, 2026): Approx. 39% approval.
The Economist +4
Factors Influencing Rating: Conflict with Iran: A recent, significant factor for the dip in approval, with many voters citing it negatively.
Economic Pressures: Inflation and cost of living remain top concerns.
Job Approval: A 36% approval rating among all adults was noted in late February, with 61% stating his policies move the country in the wrong direction.
Independence Approval: Support among independent voters dropped to 26%.
CNN +4
Economic Outlook: Although the economy was previously strong, concerns about a potential 2026 downturn are rising, driven by policy uncertainty and tariff-induced spikes in consumer prices.
Inflation & Rates: Inflation dropped to 3.0% y September 2025, yet Federal Reserve officials remained cautious about cutting rates too quickly, as inflation was still above their
target. ( 2.4-2.8 % 2026)
Market Sentiment: Investor mood has shifted from optimism to anxiety regarding a potential major economic downturn later in the year (perception that the president deliberately wanted to sabotage the economy),
1. Accelerationism: destroy a society in order to replace it with a satanic globalist woke paradise,
2. *******************************************************, compared to the USA'S paper economy of $30 trillion.)
3. The Iran war is part of that process,
4. Wars for Israel. So that Israel can finally have an empire, on the rubble of compromised Middle East states which have been destabilised by ''al-Qaeda'' and ISIS.
5. Importing a large number of lower-tier illiterate MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSLIMS into the USA, CANADA, AUSTRALIA, UK, FRANCE, and GERMANY, after that, using them for RACE-BAITING (They eat with their hands, don't you know!) for the purpose of justifying neo-crusades, and false, unverified gossip. Mullah Iran.
Though not certain, with the impending economic trouble. How does that pan out with the Rothschilds' Globalist plans?
Blatant cynical hypocrisy. A bit like championing the abolition of abortion laws and then proceeding to RAPE THEM, RITUALISTICALLY KILL THEM IN EPSTEIN'S PRESENCE/APROVAL, TO COOK THEM/SUNDAY ROAST THEM, EAT THEM AND DRINK THEIR BLOOD.
As I have stated for several years, if anybody is listening, he is not a CHRISTIAN WHO REGULARLY PRAYS TO GOD AT A designated church IN DC or MAR I LARGO. HE PRAYS FOR THE CAMERAS in the White House only, without pure deeds and pure thoughts. He is a SATANIST GLOBAL GERMAN JEW who worships BAAL, and GEORGE SOROS, who happens to reside in GERMANY with occasional visits to NY (George Santos aka the Rothschilds).
Thus, in his universe, there is a massive divergence between what he says and what he does, beloved by SPOOKS FROM AROUND THE WORLD, DECEPTION, DISHONESTY, ILLEGALLY FOOLING AND SCAMMING THE PLEBS AND EXTREME NARCISSISM (Mirror Mirror on the wall....)
NARCISSISM LOOKS OUTWARD APPEARANCE
ELLEN DEGENERATE ALLEGEDLY KILLED her Lesbian girlfriend, Anne Heche, as she championed children's right to life. She then bought her dead friend's body and proceeded to eat her former girlfriend slowly, during Christmas and special occasions, in celebration of Hollywood.
Imagine if you had such a BAAL worshipper in the WHITEHOUSE MAKING STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR THE COUNTRY.
YES, let's focus on the politicians and fixers in power only, for now.
BTW, speaking from personal experience, a ROTHSCHILD GLOBALIST BOT is very often A MALE who displays extreme unpredictability, anger tantrums and MENTAL INSTABILITY, WITH THREATS OF VIOLENCE AROUND THE CORNER. Such traits are deliberately designed by the ROTHSCHILDS as a controlling mechanism of NORMAL GOD-FEARING RATIONAL HUMANS.
HITLER, MUSSOLINI, KHOMENEI, SADDAM HUSSEIN, AND SEAN CONNERY.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7zBwwml2rs
THEY DON'T SMILE THAT OFTEN.
Ayatollah Rohullah KHOMEINI, squatting in a mansion in PARIS in 1978. Surrounded by Western faggot spooks and Ebrahim Yazdi, being prepared to enter IRAN on my birthday.
In general, there may be a perception that President Trump is not in charge, does not have a plan for the American economy, and despite firing senior staff like Kirsti Neom (a shock absorber/deflection crisis actor for the president--their job is to make the president appear normal, within the circus act), this perception of not being in control will persist and affect his approval rating.
The Trump tariffs are clearly bad, and maybe described as ''scammy'' for his billionaire buddies and especially Howard Lutnick, one of the sleaziest weasels in the American government, and a butt buddy of Epstein. President Trump's loyalty to Trump tariffs is thus very touching, with very severe outcomes for the American economy.
One can overplay the race-baiting card too far after the DNC invited them into the USA. ''Somali pirates'' is outrageous race-baiting by a civilised, rich country. Third-world immigrants are not the fundamental problem for America. Americans are gradually finding out with horror, who exactly are the real enemies and problems of the USA--specifically, globalists who have dual loyalty, and do not have the true interests of the country.
BABIES' BLOOD EXTRACTED AFTER TORTURE, IN AFGHANISTAN, AFTER .....
President Trump can retreat to the base (30%), but that will only lead to a landslide defeat in November 2026, and there are certain indications that, after that, a lame-duck presidency.
Scammy, cheap, satanic America! Scammy, cheap, bargain basement presidents.
_______________________________________________________
1. First Trump Presidency (2017–2021): Major Promises That Failed or Were Not Delivered
Immigration & Border
1. Mexico will pay for the border wall
Promise: Mexico would finance a massive wall along the southern border.
Outcome: The U.S. government funded construction instead; Mexico never paid.
2. Build a complete wall across the southern border
Promise: Build a continuous wall along the ~2,000-mile border.
Outcome: Only limited sections were built or replaced; the full wall was never completed.
3. End “catch-and-release”
Promise: Eliminate the practice of releasing migrants while awaiting court hearings.
Outcome: The policy largely continued due to legal and logistical constraints.
Health Care
4. Repeal and replace Obamacare immediately
Promise: Repeal the Affordable Care Act and replace it with something “better.”
Outcome: The ACA was never repealed; congressional attempts failed.
5. Health insurance for everybody
Promise: Trump said there would be coverage for everyone.
Outcome: No universal replacement plan was enacted.
6. Lower drug prices dramatically
Promise: Drug prices would drop significantly.
Outcome: Some limited policies were attempted, but broad reductions never occurred.
Economy & Debt
7. Eliminate the U.S. national debt
Promise: Pay off the U.S. national debt in eight years.
Outcome: The debt increased significantly during his presidency.
8. Bring back massive manufacturing jobs
Promise: Restore large numbers of industrial jobs lost to globalization.
Outcome: Manufacturing employment rose modestly pre-COVID but did not return to historic levels.
Foreign Policy
9. Defeat ISIS quickly
Promise: Destroy ISIS rapidly.
Outcome: ISIS lost territory but was not completely eliminated.
10. Make North Korea abandon nuclear weapons
Promise: Nuclear disarmament following summits with Kim Jong Un.
Outcome: North Korea retained and expanded its nuclear arsenal.
Politics & Governance
11. “Drain the swamp”
Promise: Reduce corruption and lobbyist influence in Washington.
Outcome: Many lobbyists and industry figures joined the administration.
12. Lock up EVIL Hillary Clinton
Promise: Prosecute Hillary Clinton for emails.
Outcome: No prosecution occurred.
Reality: Instead gave blow jobs to hubby Bill, and sex with Bill in the SATAN ISLAND. Whether there was a threesome, not sure?
PRESIDENT TRUMP IS A RAVING FAGGOT. NOT A REAL MAN WHO LOOKS OUT FOR AMERICA 1ST.
2. Second Trump Presidency (2025–Present): Promises Already Failing or Unfulfilled
Early assessments show many promises remain unmet or face serious obstacles.
Economy
13. “Make America affordable again”
Promise: Rapidly lower the cost of living.
Status: Tariffs and economic policies may increase prices rather than reduce them.
14. Slash electricity and energy prices by half
Promise: Reduce energy bills by 50–75%.
Status: No evidence yet that this target is achievable.
15. Pay off the national debt
Promise: Eliminate U.S. debt.
Status: Economists say this is unrealistic; tax cuts could increase deficits.
Foreign Policy
16. End the Russia-Ukraine war quickly
Promise: Resolve the war soon after taking office.
Status: The war continues with no settlement.
17. Be a global “peace president”
Promise: Reduce military conflict.
Status: Military actions and aggressive policies have continued.
Domestic Policy
18. Government efficiency overhaul
Promise: A major restructuring initiative reportedly involving Elon Musk’s “DOGE” project.
Status: The initiative failed and was shut down early.
19. Expand IVF coverage nationwide
Promise: Increase insurance coverage for fertility treatments.
Status: Critics say there was initially no clear policy plan to implement it.
3. Recycled Promises From 2016 Repeated in 2024
Analysts note Trump repeated several promises he had already failed to achieve, such as:
Fully repealing Obamacare
Completing the border wall
Ending foreign wars quickly
Reviving coal industry jobs
Eliminating the national debt
These promises were revived during the 2024 campaign despite earlier failures.
4. Overall Promise Performance
Some academic and media trackers estimate:
D-
Trump made hundreds of campaign promises during the 2016 campaign.
Only about 23% were completed in full by the end of the first term.
REAL approval rating 35%, which will go down to zero by NOVEMBER 2026.
He needs to be replaced by the GOP. Quickly.
Hitler bunker to the bitter end is not going to work.
______________________________________
Trump has broken or abandoned a large share of his major promises in both his first and now second terms, and his impulsive, grievance‑driven leadership style makes a coherent long‑term strategy for the U.S., its allies, and the international order far harder to sustain.
1–20: First‑term broken or failed promises
21–40: Second‑term broken, stalled, or internally contradictory promises
41–60: How Trump’s leadership traits and mental‑health‑related concerns complicate policy and alliance strategy
1–20: First‑term promise failures (2017–2021)
1. Mexico paying for the wall – Trump did not make Mexico pay for the border wall; U.S. taxpayers funded limited new barriers and repairs, and only a fraction of the promised wall was actually built.
2. Physical wall completion – He promised a continuous “great wall”; instead, most construction was replacement or secondary fencing, not a new continuous barrier.
Mass deportation of “millions” – There was no sustained “deportation force” and deportations did not reach the campaign’s promised “millions per year” level.
Ending birthright citizenship – He repeatedly vowed to end it, even by executive order, but never did.
Nationwide “stop and frisk” and national right‑to‑carry – He pledged to push national concealed‑carry reciprocity and removal of “gun‑free zones,” but these did not pass Congress.
Full repeal and replacement of Obamacare “on day one” – The repeal effort failed in the Senate; the law survived and remains the core of U.S. health‑insurance architecture.
“Insurance for everybody” that is “much less expensive” – His backed proposals would have reduced coverage and did not create universal coverage or clearly lower costs.
Prescription drug price cuts via negotiation – He promised the government would negotiate prices aggressively; structural reform on this front largely stalled in his first term.
Massive infrastructure bill (“Infrastructure Week”) – He touted a huge program (often “1 trillion dollars”), but no comprehensive, dedicated infrastructure package was passed; the phrase “Infrastructure Week” became a joke.
Eliminating the federal deficit and reducing national debt – He claimed he would eliminate the federal debt in 8 years, but deficits rose, and the debt increased significantly even before the Covid shock.
Sustained 3.5–4% economic growth – Growth never averaged above 3% annually during his first term, falling far short of his repeated targets.
Renegotiating NAFTA into something dramatically better for workers – USMCA tweaked NAFTA but did not constitute the radical re-industrialisation he promised, and many manufacturing job gains stalled even before 2020.
Bringing back coal and “ending the war on coal” as a jobs engine – Despite regulatory rollbacks, structural decline in coal employment and plant closures continued.
Swift re‑negotiation of the Iran nuclear deal to get a “better deal” – He withdrew from the deal but never secured a replacement; Iran’s nuclear program advanced, and tensions escalated.
Forcing allies to dramatically increase defense spending through pressure alone – He claimed NATO was “obsolete” and that his toughness would make allies pay; while some spending rose, there was no large‑scale, structural burden‑sharing transformation matching his rhetoric.
Term limits for members of Congress – He pledged to push a constitutional amendment, but did not seriously pursue it.
Major action on student loans and tuition – Promised to address soaring college costs and simplify repayment; no major structural reform materialized in his first term.
“Draining the swamp” and reducing lobbyist influence – His administration featured extensive lobbying ties, ethics waivers, and revolving‑door appointments, undermining his promise of radical anti‑corruption reform.
Comprehensive “law and order” strategy reducing crime nationally – Crime trends were mixed, and he offered more rhetoric than a coherent, evidence‑based national strategy.
Overall fulfilment rate – One systematic analysis found he made hundreds of promises in 2016 and fully delivered on only about a quarter by the end of his first term, far below his campaign claims.
21–40: Second‑term (2025–2029) promises: failures, stalls, and contradictions
Many second‑term promises build on earlier ones but are even more sweeping or unrealistic.
Restoring very low inflation and “booming” growth quickly – He promised rapid macroeconomic improvements; early second‑term performance has not matched the magnitude or speed of his rhetoric.
Large, immediate energy price cuts (“cut in half”) – He pledged to halve electricity and energy prices within 12–18 months, a claim far out of line with energy market dynamics and not achieved.
Cutting car insurance rates by 50% – There is no plausible federal mechanism to do this at scale, and no such reduction has occurred.
Capping credit‑card interest rates at about 10% – He has not delivered legislation or regulation to impose such a cap; market rates remain much higher.
Making car‑loan interest and home generators tax‑deductible nationwide – These items have not been enacted into law despite being highlighted as signature cost‑of‑living promises.
Building “Freedom Cities” with flying‑car infrastructure – The “10 Freedom Cities” and futuristic transport promise remains aspirational, with no concrete implementation roadmap.
Keeping Social Security and Medicare fully intact “no cuts” – His broader fiscal agenda (tax cuts, defence spending, and annual budget cuts) is internally inconsistent with long‑term solvency guarantees, making the “no cuts” pledge very hard to honour.
Cutting the federal budget every year, He has promised continuous annual cuts while simultaneously advocating expensive initiatives and tax reductions, an internally conflicting agenda.
Creating a “government efficiency commission” that eliminates fraud enough to fund big tax cuts – Anti‑waste commissions historically find savings, but nowhere near the scale implied; there is no evidence his proposal has delivered transformative savings.
Aggressively reducing federal regulations while also promising stability for key sectors – Ongoing deregulatory pushes in areas like climate and finance introduce uncertainty that undercuts his claims of predictable business conditions.
Keeping the U.S. dollar as unquestioned reserve currency while attacking key institutions – He pledges to defend dollar dominance while undermining central‑bank independence and institutional predictability, which support that dominance.
“America First” trade policy that still strengthens alliances – Tariffs and transactional tactics strain relations with allies and multilateral institutions, clashing with rhetoric about leading a strong allied bloc.
Cancelling “green mandates” while promising long‑term energy security – Rolling back electric‑vehicle and climate policies satisfies some domestic constituencies, but it contradicts stated aims to ensure future‑proofed energy competitiveness.
Fighting crime and drugs with harsh rhetoric but limited structural reforms – Second‑term promises again emphasize toughness, but deeper policing, sentencing, and social‑policy reforms remain underdeveloped or inconsistent.
Sweeping immigration crackdown without systemic capacity – Renewed vows of mass deportations and hardline measures run into the same legal, logistical, and diplomatic constraints as in his first term.
“Total” dismantling of DEI and transgender protections – He promises to end federal DEI programs and roll back transgender rights nationwide, but faces constitutional limits, court challenges, and state‑level resistance.
Expanding presidential authority while preserving checks and balances – His embrace of plans like those in Project 2025 implies a more centralized presidency, in tension with stated respect for “constitutional” government and ally expectations of a rule‑of‑law partner.
Hardline stance on China while undermining allied trade coordination – Confronting China requires tight coordination with allies, but his protectionist and confrontational stance toward them undercuts that coalition‑building.
Assuring allies of U.S. reliability while threatening to abandon or condition security guarantees – Statements suggesting allies must “pay up” or face reduced protection clash directly with his promises of strong leadership of the “free world.”
Overall second‑term promise trajectory – Early tracking shows many 2024 campaign promises (on prices, crime, immigration, culture, and bureaucracy) either stalled, internally contradictory, or on paths unlikely to reach the advertised scale.
41–60: Leadership style, mental‑health concerns, and strategic policy
Here, the focus is not on diagnosis, but on how behaviour patterns described by political psychologists and mental‑health experts affect statecraft.
Impulsivity and policy volatility – Analysts note Trump often makes rapid decisions based on gut instinct rather than a structured process, leading to sudden policy shifts (for example, on Syria or trade) that complicate long‑term strategy.
Reliance on grievance and personal loyalty – His leadership style centers loyalty to him personally and perceived slights, which can distort policy priorities away from consistent national‑interest criteria.
Limited tolerance for dissenting information – Accounts from former officials and academic analyses describe a tendency to dismiss or attack unwelcome briefings, making thoughtful, evidence‑based strategy formation more difficult.
Narcissistic traits and self‑image – Many experts argue he shows traits associated with narcissism (grandiosity, need for admiration, low empathy), which can make it harder to accept constraints, admit error, or sustain cooperative diplomacy.
Communication style and cognitive concerns – Observers have noted repetitive phrasing, tangents, and difficulty maintaining topic focus in public speech, which some interpret as possible cognitive ageing or decline, though others dispute a clear diagnosis.
Unpredictability as a constant tactic – While some unpredictability can be a bargaining tool, Trump’s pattern of frequent reversals makes it harder for allies and adversaries to credibly interpret U.S. commitments.
Erosion of institutional process – His impatience with bureaucratic procedure leads to sidelining formal interagency processes, reducing the quality of vetting for complex policies (for example, early travel‑ban orders).
Short time horizons – Emphasis on immediate media wins and rallies incentivizes headline‑driven policy rather than patient investment in alliances, development, or climate strategy.
Personalisation of foreign relations – He places a heavy emphasis on personal rapport with leaders (for example, Putin, Kim) rather than stable institutional ties, which can undermine predictable alliance management.
Stress, power, and mental health – Experts note that high‑stress roles can exacerbate impulsivity and rigidity; for a leader already prone to reactive behaviour, this can deepen volatility in crisis.
Effect on allies’ trust – Because allied governments must plan years ahead, Trump’s erratic signals and threats toward partners encourage hedging and diversification away from U.S. leadership.
Strategic clarity vs. performative toughness – His rhetoric projects strength, but inconsistent follow‑through (for example, on Iran, North Korea, NATO funding) blurs the line between real red lines and domestic performance.
Policy captured by in‑group media ecosystem – His apparent dependence on favourable media outlets creates feedback loops that reward escalation and purity over compromise, harming stable policy design.
Impact on bureaucracy morale and expertise – Attacks on “the deep state” and public servants contribute to brain drain and risk aversion inside agencies, degrading long‑term strategic capacity.
Domestic polarization as a strategic liability – His communication amplifies internal polarization, which adversaries can exploit and which makes sustained bipartisan foreign policy far harder.
Rule‑of‑law and democratic‑norm concerns – Efforts to stretch presidential authority and retaliate against perceived enemies worry allies who depend on the U.S. as a predictable constitutional democracy.
Mixed expert views on formal “mental illness” – Some psychiatrists argue his behavior reflects personality pathology and possible cognitive issues; others insist he does not meet strict diagnostic criteria, underscoring that the main concern is functional fitness, not labels.
Risk in crisis decision‑making – Impulsivity, sensitivity to personal humiliation, and information‑processing issues could impair calm, deliberative choices in military or financial crises, increasing global risk.
Difficulty sustaining multi‑year, multi‑actor strategies – Effective climate, China, or tech policy requires steady coalitions and policy continuity, which sit uneasily with his erratic, personalized leadership style.
Net effect on U.S. and global order – Combining high promise‑failure rates, internal policy contradictions, and psychologically driven volatility, Trump’s leadership makes it harder to maintain clear, credible strategic policies that are good for America, its allies, and international stability.
__________________________________________________________
Metaphors and Euphemisms for Gay/Queer/FAGGOT
Friend of Dorothy (FOD): A long-standing, vintage code for a gay man, referencing Judy Garland’s character in The Wizard of Oz.
Batting for the other team: A common metaphor for gay men.
Light in the loafers: A slang term for an effeminate or gay man.
On the bus/On the team: Idioms indicating someone is part of the gay community.
Alphabet Mafia: A colloquialism for the entire LGBTQIA+ community, alluding to the length of the acronym.
Fruit/Fruity: Used to describe gay men or things implied to be queer (derived from older, offensive terms).
100-footer: Someone whose queer identity is immediately obvious or radiates from "100 feet away".
Closet Queen/In the Closet: Someone who has not disclosed their sexuality.
National Library of Scotland +7
Colloquialisms and Subculture Types (Urban Dictionary/Gay Slang)Bear: A larger, hairier, and usually more masculine-presenting gay man.
Twink: A younger, thinner, and less hairy gay man.
Otter: A thinner, hairier gay man.
Wolf: A leaner, muscular, and hairy gay man.
Cub: A younger, stocky/heavy hairy man (similar to a bear).
Top/Bottom/Versatile: Terms referring to roles in sexual activity (inserting, receiving, or both).
Side: A gay man who prefers non-penetrative sex.
Trade: A straight-passing or heterosexual male partner sought by gay men.
Fag Hag: A woman who primarily hangs out with gay men.
Fag Stag: A straight man who hangs out with gay men.
Queen/Camp: An effeminate or theatrical gay man.
Gaybourhood: A neighborhood with a high density of LGBTQ+ residents.
Baby Gay/Baby Dyke: Someone new to the community or recently out.
Specific "Queen" Subtypes (Gay Slang)Bean/Taco/Salsa Queen: A white gay man primarily attracted to Hispanic men.
Rice Queen: A gay man attracted to East Asian men.
Potato Queen: A gay Asian man attracted to white men.
Chicken Queen: An older gay man interested in younger men.
Size Queen: Someone obsessed with the size of a partner's penis.
Wikipedia +3
Reclaimed and Aggressive Terms
Queer: Once a harsh slur, now widely reclaimed as an umbrella term for the community, often signifying resistance to heteronormativity.
FAG FAGGOT
Fudge Packer
______________________________________________________________
1. So this is the leadership of the ''Free World''; when children are tortured and murdered satanically by its leader, not much freedom there. ''The Shining light on the Hill'' ''Manifest destiny'' ''The exceptional nation''
A Beacon of Hope
The Guiding Light
A Light in the Darkness
A Ray of Hope
The Rising Dawn
The Morning Star
A Candle in the Night
The Dawn of a New Era
The Eternal Flame
A Lighthouse in the Storm
A City on the Hill
The Standard Bearer
A Model for the World
The Torch of Freedom
The Vanguard of Progress
The Pillar of Strength
The Flagship of Excellence
The Gold Standard
The Cornerstone of Civilization
The Crown Jewel
The Garden of Promise
The Fountain of Wisdom
The Wellspring of Hope
The Tree of Life
The Pure Flame
The Sacred Trust
The Noble Path
The House of Light
The Path to Greatness
The Bridge to Tomorrow
The Engine of Progress
The Frontier of Opportunity
The Road to Prosperity
The Gateway to the Future
The Summit of Achievement
The Golden Horizon
The Lamp of Liberty
The Temple of Justice
The Beacon of Civilization
The Torchbearer of Truth
The Guardian of Freedom
The Citadel of Hope
NARY A POSSIBILITY WITH SUCH SATANIC PEOPLE.
ANY GOD-FEARING PERSON WHO HAS AN OUNCE OF DECENCY SHOULD NEVER ACCEPT TRUMP AS PRESIDENT. THEY SHOULD NOT VOTE FOR HIM.
TRUMP CANNOT BE PRESIDENT OF AMERICA FOR ANOTHER SECOND. HE MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. EVERY DAY HE STAYS IN POWER MEANS UTTER DISASTER FOR THE USA. WHILST THIS IS DESIRABLE FOR THE SATANIC GLOBALISTS **********************************************************************, THIS MUST BE FOUGHT AGAINST BY BRAVE AMERICANS.
THOSE OF US WHO HAVE HIGH OPINIONS OF THE USA, ITS CULTURE, PHILOSOPHY, GREAT IDEAS AND TECHNOLOGY WHICH ARE PART OF OUR LIVES, HEMINGWAY, F. SCOT FITZGERALD, STARSKY AND HUTCH...AND RELATIVES IN THE COUNTRY CANNOT ALLOW THE COUNTRY TO FALL INTO THE ABYSS, AND simply DISAPPEAR.
GOD SAVE AMERICA!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
WE FIGHT AND STRUGGLE FOR AMERICA TOGETHER.
________________________________________________
The Mullahs have an Esptein connection
As I have stated in the past, with a blog titled, ''Mullah Iran is Jewish'' since deleted as it seemed anti-Semitic at the time of publication (2025). I wanna be nice and friendly with everybody, always smiling and happy, whilst I get tortured by the Satanic Globalists, since at least 1985.
Smiley, smiley smiley. in that typical innocent third-world way.
When Cyrus the Great entered Babylon in 539 BC, one of the first things he did was free the Jewish people from slavery, torture, humiliation and bondage. Cyrus allowed them to return to Judea. Cyrus gave them money to rebuild their temples after the Assyrian empire destroyed them.
Modern art depicting Cyrus freeing the JEWS of BABYLON.
Most significantly, Cyrus recruited the Jews, an educated people, into his Persian bureaucracy to run the empire and manage non-Persians. This gave Jews enormous power and opportunity within the Persian empire, which they did not subsequently enjoy in the Levant, under the Greeks, the Romans, the ARABS and especially the Mongols in the 13th century. Most Palestinian Jews converted to Islam, especially after the CRUSADES.
This is why, as late as 1979, there were anywhere between 200,000 and 300,000 Jews living in Iran. No amount of false fags could persuade the Iranian Jews to run to Israel for safety and ALIYA. Until the ''ISLAMIC REVOLUTION " organised by the USA, with European assistance. ''Arc of Crisis''.
However, they are not known for being generous, giving, kind people, endowed with gratitude. These Semitic people, originating from Libya 3500 years ago, are a small-hearted cult-like people, filled with envy and jealousy. Suffering eternal victimhood, and viewing humans as ''goy'' cattle to be abused and exploited.
Moammer Ben GADDAFI, possibly with Jewish lineage, was installed by the USA as their puppet to sell Socialism to the newly independent third world, with guns and money.
The eating of GOY babies (about 8 million each year), drinking their blood, torturing them as in the manner and belief systems of primitive people in the Stone Age (Neanderthals also ate their babies), makes Jews, rather primitive Semitic North Africans, clinging to a bizarre Bongo Bongo religion from 4,000 years in the Near East. Sexual activity can take place with their own children, especially mother and son, and of course with goy children from around the world. The Jews are a highly sexualised race.
That is why they have been expelled 109 times from various countries.
Some elite Jews even believe they are ARYANS!!!!!! The Nazi definition. The ''master race''. These elite Jews can bankroll Nazi Germany (1933-1945) through the BIS in satanic SWITZERLAND. The NAZI regime was the very definition of satanic worship.
This satanic cult obviously lacks basic humanity and gratitude. That is, whilst they enjoy the power and largesse of the Persian empire (ACHMEDIAN, PARTHIAN, SASSANID), they can just as easily backstab it without a second thought.
Take their victimhood festival called PURIM, where they celebrate defeating the Persian Grand Vizier, who allegedly wishes to commit genocide against all JEWS. This desert campfire story sounds very JEWEY AND SUSPECT TO ME, AS THERE IS NO HISTORICAL FACT BASIS FOR THIS DESERT CAMPFIRE STORY. However, their rather clever Jewish female foils the evil HAMAN's plot and marries the Persian emperor!
This 'festival' is suspect on many levels. If the greatest Persian emperor freed Jews from slavery and gave them an elevated position in his empire, no subsequent emperor or his subordinates would dare to countermand Cyrus's sacred orders. There is no record of this in Persian history, but ungrateful Jews celebrate this festival, eating SAMOSAS (which represent Haman's ears). Not that far removed from eating Satanic kiddy jerky.
Haman's ear during PURIM, another Jewish victimhood festival.
AND, so to the 20th century and the CIA coup against Mossaddeg, the popular nationalist leader of Iran in 1953.
James Jesus Angleton and the Christian Zionists within the CIA decide to invite MOSSAD into Iran in the 1950s. The CIA/MOSSAD together created SAVAK, the notorious Iranian secret police modelled on the GESTAPO. The CIA especially have a sexualised passion for NAZI Germany. It's their guy, Alan Dulles, perched in BIS SWITZERLAND, who communicates and feels out the Nazi regime. Allen Dulles was based in Bern, Switzerland, from November 1942 until the end of World War II in 1945. Arriving on November 12, 1942, he served as the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) Director, operating from 23 Herrengasse to gather intelligence and negotiate the surrender of German forces in Italy (Operation Sunrise). Allen DULLES is a busy man in Switzerland (1942-45). Laundering NAZI LOOT, and senior Nazi figures. Some whispers say that he helped HITLER escape to South America (Switzerland--Spain--Colombia--Argentina)...where he died in 1965, allegedly.
The MOSSAD in Iran is very busy building networks in Iran, and recruiting agents from the enormous Jewish community, and also Persian nationals who would sell their souls. 1950-1970s. By 1979, this network was huge, containing spies for Israel, and Sayanim, Iranian Jews who spy for Israel for free.
But there is no problem for the Shah, with this vast foreign spy network on Iranian soil, as he has good relations with Israel, and as Israel's best friend in the Middle East. A MOSSAD agent could torture an Iranian citizen in Evin prison Iran for being a Communist, and not feel any legal repercussion:
Between 1953 and the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Israel and Iran under Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi maintained one of the closest covert alliances in the Middle East. Although Iran never formally recognized Israel diplomatically, the two states developed deep economic, military, intelligence, and strategic cooperation as part of Israel’s “periphery doctrine” (alliances with non-Arab states).
Below is a comprehensive, structured list of the major benefits Israel gained from the Shah’s Iran across economic, military, security, diplomatic, and strategic domains.
1. Energy and Economic Benefits
Oil supply (one of Israel’s most critical strategic benefits)
Iran supplied 40%–70% of Israel’s oil imports at different times during the Shah’s rule.
This was crucial because most Arab states boycotted Israel and refused to sell oil.
Iranian oil ensured:
Israeli industrial growth
Military fuel supplies
Energy security during wars and crises.
Major oil infrastructure
Joint construction of the Eilat–Ashkelon oil pipeline connecting the Red Sea to the Mediterranean.
Allowed Israel to:
Bypass the Suez Canal
Transport Iranian oil to Europe
Become an energy transit hub.
Oil-for-arms barter arrangements
Iran traded oil in exchange for Israeli weapons and technology, boosting Israel’s defense sector.
2. Major Trade and Commercial Benefits
Iran became one of Israel’s largest trading partners outside Europe and the U.S.
Trade volume
Annual bilateral trade exceeded $100 million in some years.
Over 200 Israeli companies operated in Iran.
Israeli exports to Iran included
Agricultural technologies
Irrigation systems
Industrial machinery
Electronics
Telecommunications
Medical equipment
Construction services
Consumer goods
fertilizers
aviation technology
tyres and manufacturing equipment.
Joint ventures
Tire factories
Construction projects
shipping and aviation companies
refinery cooperation.
These activities generated substantial revenue for Israeli companies.
3. Military and Defense Industry Benefits
Iran became one of Israel’s largest secret arms customers.
Arms sales
Israel sold Iran:
small arms
mortars
ammunition
radar systems
communications equipment
air-defense systems
military training.
These sales:
financed Israel’s young defense industry
expanded Israeli weapons production capacity.
Maintenance and military services
Israel also provided:
aircraft maintenance
military technical training
logistics and engineering support.
4. Joint Weapons Development
A major strategic benefit was joint R&D funding.
Project Flower
Israel and Iran cooperated in developing advanced missiles under Project Flower in the late 1970s.
Iran funded Israeli missile research.
The project aimed to develop advanced anti-ship missiles and possibly nuclear-capable systems.
This gave Israel:
funding for advanced weapons programs
strategic missile development experience.
5. Intelligence and Security Cooperation
One of the deepest collaborations occurred between:
Israel’s Mossad
Iran’s SAVAK
Intelligence sharing
The two agencies cooperated on:
Soviet activities
Arab nationalist movements
regional intelligence operations.
Counter-insurgency and internal security
Israel:
trained SAVAK officers
shared interrogation and surveillance methods
Conducted joint covert operations against Iraq mostly.
Operational base
Iran served as:
a forward intelligence base for Israeli operations in the Middle East.
This allowed Israel to monitor:
Iraq
Gulf states
Soviet influence.
6. Strategic Military Geography
Iran provided Israel strategic depth far beyond its borders.
Benefits included:
Monitoring hostile Arab states
Iran allowed intelligence monitoring of:
Iraq
Syria
Soviet Central Asia.
Operations against Iraq
Iran cooperated with Israel to support Kurdish rebels in northern Iraq, weakening Baghdad.
This helped Israel counter one of its most hostile regional enemies.
7. Diplomatic and Political Benefits
Iran provided Israel with major diplomatic advantages.
Breaking Israel’s regional isolation
Iran became one of the few Muslim-majority states maintaining relations with Israel.
This:
Reduced Israel’s diplomatic isolation
demonstrated that non-Arab states could cooperate with Israel.
Alignment with U.S. policy
Both countries were key pro-Western Cold War allies.
Their cooperation strengthened:
U.S. strategic influence in the Middle East
Israel’s position within the Western security bloc.
Legitimacy and indirect recognition
Although relations were discreet, Iran hosted an Israeli mission in Tehran with diplomatic privileges.
8. Jewish Community and Humanitarian Benefits
Iran had one of the largest Jewish communities in the Middle East.
Benefits included:
safe environment for Iranian Jews
cooperation in assisting Jewish migration.
Iran also helped facilitate the rescue or relocation of Jews from Iraq and other regions.
9. Technology and Scientific Collaboration
Iran funded or purchased Israeli technologies in:
irrigation
desalination
desert agriculture
water management
telecommunications
engineering.
This provided Israel with:
revenue
opportunities to test technologies in large projects.
10. Economic Employment Opportunities
Thousands of Israelis worked in Iran as:
engineers
agricultural experts
military advisers
doctors
technicians.
An Israeli expatriate community became large enough to establish Israeli schools in Tehran.
11. Strategic Balance of Power in the Middle East
The Shah’s Iran served as:
a counterweight to Arab nationalism
a rival to Iraq
a barrier to Soviet expansion.
For Israel this meant:
fewer coordinated Arab threats
a powerful non-Arab ally on the region’s eastern flank.
12. Financial and Investment Benefits
Iranian contracts helped generate:
major revenues for Israeli industries
defense sector expansion
infrastructure financing.
Some scholars describe this relationship as a “cash bonanza” for Israel.
13. Covert Strategic Network (“Periphery Doctrine”)
Israel’s strategy under David Ben-Gurion sought alliances with non-Arab states such as:
Iran
Turkey
Ethiopia
The Shah’s cooperation became the most important pillar of this strategy.
______________________________________
Israel's Strategic Benefits from the Shah of Iran (1953–1979)
Executive INTELLIGENCE Summary
From 1953 to 1979, Israel and Pahlavi Iran maintained one of the most consequential covert alliances in the modern Middle East. Grounded in shared fears of Arab nationalism and Soviet expansionism, this partnership delivered Israel with sweeping advantages in energy security, military development, intelligence, diplomacy, and trade. The relationship operated largely in secrecy — both governments understood that public acknowledgement would damage Iran's standing in the Arab and Muslim world — yet it was deep, institutionalised, and transformative for the young Israeli state. As Trita Parsi summarised, "For Israel, Iran under the Shah represented its most important strategic partner in the region."
I. Diplomatic and Political Benefits
Recognition and Legitimacy
Iran's diplomatic stance toward Israel was a rare and consequential political gift. In March 1950, Iran became the second Muslim-majority country to recognize Israel de facto — following only Turkey — at a time when the Arab League states and most of the Islamic world refused to acknowledge Israel's existence. This recognition defied the dominant tide of pan-Arab nationalism led by Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser and gave Israel a crucial foothold of legitimacy in the Muslim world. Although de jure formal recognition was withheld for domestic political reasons — the Shah dared not inflame Arab opinion — the practical effect was nearly equivalent.
Permanent Diplomatic Presence in Tehran
Following the 1953 CIA- and MI6-assisted coup that restored the Shah to power, Israel established a permanent diplomatic mission in Tehran that functioned as a de facto embassy. By 1961, Iran also maintained "secret" representation in Tel Aviv. In the 1970s, both nations exchanged ambassadors — Israel had two successive ambassadors to Tehran — an exceptional arrangement given the hostility of the surrounding Arab environment. Israeli representatives cultivated direct access not merely to Iranian Foreign Ministry officials but to a narrow circle of Shah loyalists, the Iranian defense establishment, and on occasion the Shah himself and his Royal Court Minister.
High-Level Political Engagement
Israeli heads of state and senior officials met directly with the Shah. Prime Minister Golda Meir visited Iran as Foreign Minister in 1965 and met personally with the Shah to negotiate the foundational oil pipeline deal. Meir met the Shah again in 1972 and reported that he endorsed strengthening cooperation among countries standing against communism — specifically naming Israel, Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia. When Meir resigned and Yitzhak Rabin succeeded her, Rabin too visited Iran and met in December 1974 with the head of Iranian security services. Defense Minister Shimon Peres signed six oil-for-arms contracts in Tehran with the Shah in April 1977, including the landmark Project Flower.
Countering Arab Isolation and the Arab Boycott
Israel in this era faced a crippling Arab economic boycott that sought to sever the Jewish state from global commerce. Iran's partnership served as a crucial counterpressure. The Shah maintained economic, commercial, and security ties with Israel even as Arab League members pressured Muslim states to join the boycott. By providing oil, purchasing Israeli goods, hosting Israeli companies, and exchanging ambassadors, Iran effectively punched a large hole in the Arab League's cordon. Israel's Israeli ambassador Uri Lubrani noted that "the security arrangements that were recently signed create an Israeli commitment to Iran vis-Ã -vis sensitive areas, as well as Iranian financial commitments that are significant for our national economy."
The Periphery Doctrine: Strategic Encirclement of the Arab World
The alliance with Iran was the centrepiece of Israel's grand strategic "Periphery Doctrine," conceived by Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and his advisor Eliahu Sassoon in the early 1950s. Recognizing that Israel was surrounded by hostile Arab states, Ben-Gurion sought alliances with non-Arab states on the periphery — Turkey, Iran, and Ethiopia — that shared Israel's fears of Arab nationalism and Soviet influence. Iran's participation in what became known as the "Trident Alliance" allowed Israel to emerge from its regional isolation, demonstrating strategic value to both regional powers and its great-power patron, the United States. Iran's partnership helped Israel demonstrate that non-Arab states could resist Nasserist Pan-Arabism and served as a vital buffer against ideological and military encirclement.
Access to US Influence via Iranian Lobbying
The Shah believed — and Israel leveraged the fact — that close ties with Israel translated into access to American Jewish political influence, the U.S. Congress, media, business community, and the White House. Iran saw Israel as a gateway to Washington. This triangular dynamic meant that Israel's alliance with Iran indirectly amplified Israel's own standing and leverage in American politics and foreign policy circles. The arrangement reinforced the US-Israel-Iran triangle that characterized Cold War geopolitics in the region until 1979.
II. Economic and Trade Benefits
Oil Supply: Overcoming the Arab Embargo
Iran became Israel's primary — and at times sole — supplier of crude oil, a vital lifeline for a state subjected to Arab energy boycotts. Iran supplied up to 60% of Israel's oil through a discreet pipeline arrangement. Israel purchased a significant portion, and in some years all, of its oil from the Shah's regime. When Arab OPEC members imposed an oil embargo on Israel's supporters during and after the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Iran — under the Shah — continued producing and exporting, ensuring Israel and its allies were not crippled by the Arab oil weapon. Crucially, Iran sold oil to Israel even during periods when the Seven Sisters (the dominant Western oil majors) were reluctant to openly supply Israel for fear of Arab retaliation.
The Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline: A Joint Energy Infrastructure Landmark
One of the most strategically and economically consequential projects of the alliance was the Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline, constructed as a 50/50 joint venture in 1968. The 254-kilometer pipeline connected the Red Sea port of Eilat to the Mediterranean coast at Ashkelon, with a capacity of 600,000 barrels per day and nearly 23 million barrels of storage space. Built after the closure of the Suez Canal in 1967, it allowed Iranian oil to reach European markets faster, more cheaply, and without transit fees — bypassing Arab-controlled sea routes. For Israel, the pipeline guaranteed a continuous, domestic energy supply route that was immune to Arab political disruptions. Iran and Israel established the Trans-Asiatic Oil company, registered in Panama and Switzerland, as a joint vehicle for these transactions. When Iran paid a $280 million oil down payment for Project Flower in 1977, it did so in part through the pipeline arrangement.
Bilateral Trade and Commercial Activity
Beyond oil, bilateral trade was brisk and multifaceted. Israeli construction firms and engineers were active throughout Iran. El Al, Israel's national carrier, operated regular direct flights between Tel Aviv and Tehran — at times multiple times a day — making the Tehran–Tel Aviv route one of El Al's most active and lucrative. Large Israeli companies maintained representative offices in Iran, and the Iranian-Israeli trading company IRIS was founded as early as 1953 to encourage commercial ties. Israeli firms involved in agriculture, textiles, electricity, and construction all had active operations in Iran.
Defense Industry Revenue
Iran became one of the most important customers for Israel's nascent defense industry — a sector that required scale and foreign sales to remain economically viable. Between 1968 and 1972 alone, documented defense exports included: IMI Systems — $20.9 million; Soltam (mortars) — $16.9 million; Motorola (Israel) — $12 million; Tadiran — $11.3 million; and Israel Aerospace Industries — $1.3 million, among others. Tadiran went further and set up a radio equipment factory inside Iran. In addition, the Uzi submachine gun — manufactured by IMI and sold to the Iranian army — became a landmark export success driven largely by Mossad operative and military attaché Ya'acov Nimrodi's close relationship with the Shah's generals. Iran's purchases helped finance and scale Israeli defense firms including Rafael and Tadiran, whose expertise and technology grew significantly through Iranian contracts.
Project Flower: Iranian Funding of Israeli Missile Research
Project Flower, signed in April 1977 as one of six oil-for-arms contracts between the two countries, was perhaps the most lucrative single agreement for Israel's defense R&D. The project aimed to develop advanced surface-to-surface missiles, and according to RAND, Tehran "reportedly paid approximately $300 million in cash and another $250 million in oil for the joint program." Iranian financial contributions — totaling an estimated $550 million in combined cash and oil payments — effectively subsidized Israeli missile research and development at a time when Israel's own defense budget was constrained. This represents one of the largest foreign-funded defense R&D programs in Israeli history.
Agricultural and Technological Trade
Iran imported Israeli industrial goods and medical equipment in exchange for Iranian agricultural products. Israel sent numerous agricultural experts to Iran under what became a structured technical assistance program. Israeli company TAHAL (Water Planning Ltd.) supervised the construction of water and sewer systems in Isfahan and Bandar Abbas, created household and irrigation water networks in regions including Hamdan, Kermanshah, and Qazvin, and helped drill deep-water wells that transformed Qazvin into an agricultural hub by the 1970s. This technical cooperation generated revenue and goodwill for Israeli firms while establishing Israel as a recognized development partner in the Iranian economy.
III. Military Benefits
Training and Modernization of the Iranian Armed Forces
Thousands of Israeli military advisors, officers, and technical specialists served in Iran during the Shah's era, helping to train and modernize the Iranian military. The two countries established "close, friendly, and practical partnership between the IDF and the security services and their Iranian counterparts, with joint execution of programs and missions of national importance." Israeli attachés were in daily contact with the Iranian general staff. Iran's Air Force — which became one of the region's most powerful under the Shah — underwent renovation with Israeli assistance, including the overhaul of Iranian Air Force planes and civil aviation aircraft for full compensation paid to Israeli firms.
Access to a Regional Testing and Staging Ground
Israel gained practical use of Iranian territory and logistics as an extension of its own strategic space. Iran's geography — bordering the Soviet Union, Iraq, and the Persian Gulf — gave Israel indirect access to intelligence about Soviet activities, Iraqi military movements, and subversive Communist operations in the region. Israeli officials noted the benefit of "taking full advantage of the Iranian territory" for intelligence and regional operations. The Israeli military's daily coordination with Iran's general staff also meant that IDF planning benefited from Iranian military intelligence and strategic assessments.
Project Flower and Advanced Missile Capability
Through Project Flower, Israel gained a massive, externally funded program to develop longer-range surface-to-surface missiles, including a modified Gabriel anti-ship missile and an extended-range variant. The project intended to reproduce an American-designed missile with Israeli-made parts, incorporating American navigation and guidance equipment. Construction of a missile assembly facility near Sirjan and a missile test range near Rafsanjan inside Iran was begun. Iran supplied Israel with $280 million worth of oil as a project down payment in 1978 alone. Though the project was terminated by the 1979 Revolution, its technology and R&D outputs remained with Israel's defense establishment.
Arms Sales Revenue Enabling Military Self-Sufficiency
The revenues from arms sales to Iran were a major driver behind Israel's strategic decision in the late 1960s and 1970s to develop an independent, domestically produced military-industrial complex. Iran was Israel's most important arms customer before 1979, and the scale of Iranian purchases — covering mortars, submachine guns, missiles, communications equipment, and military vehicles — provided Israeli defense firms with the cash flow and production volumes necessary to invest in next-generation systems like the Kfir fighter and the Merkava tank.
IV. Intelligence and Security Benefits
Co-Founding and Development of SAVAK
In 1957, the Shah established SAVAK, one of the Middle East's most powerful intelligence agencies, with direct organizational assistance from both the CIA and Mossad. Mossad was especially instrumental in training SAVAK's new recruits and shaping its operational doctrine when the agency was founded. This founding role gave Mossad unparalleled access to SAVAK's structure, methods, personnel, and intelligence holdings. Israel's spy agency had effectively "built" SAVAK into an efficient intelligence service, as Nimrodi boasted. In return, Mossad embedded itself deeply within Iran's domestic intelligence apparatus — a strategic intelligence asset of the first order.
Comprehensive Intelligence Sharing
The Mossad-SAVAK relationship became one of the most active bilateral intelligence partnerships of the Cold War era. Mossad regularly transmitted to SAVAK intelligence reports on Egypt's activities in Arab countries, trends and developments in Iraq, and Communist activities affecting Iran. In return, Israel received intelligence on Soviet movements in the region and Iranian assessments of Arab military dispositions. This two-way exchange materially improved Israel's regional situational awareness at a time when it was diplomatically isolated from most of the Arab neighborhood.
Joint Kurdish Operations Against Iraq
Israel and Iran conducted joint covert operations in support of Kurdish insurgents in northern Iraq throughout the 1960s. Both countries shared a strategic interest in weakening Baathist Iraq — Iran's main rival in the Gulf, and one of Israel's most virulently anti-Israel neighbors. Mossad and SAVAK collaborated on arming, advising, and sustaining Kurdish forces, tying down Iraqi military resources and preventing Baghdad from focusing its military capacity on Israel's borders. Nimrodi personally played a key role in "organizing and encouraging the rebellion of Kurdish tribesmen against Iraq." This proxy war was a direct security gain for Israel, reducing the combat power of a front-line Arab state.
Counterintelligence Against Nasser's Egypt
Israel used Iran as a platform for anti-Nasser propaganda and intelligence operations throughout the 1960s. Israeli experts were employed in anti-Nasser Persian-language propaganda directed at Persian Gulf audiences. The Shah, who viewed Nasser's pan-Arab ideology as an existential threat to his own regime, cooperated actively in this effort. Iran's radio and political influence in the Gulf served Israeli strategic interests by blunting Nasser's attempts to build hostile coalitions among Gulf states and on the Arabian Peninsula.
Intelligence Access to Soviet Borders
Iran's physical proximity to the Soviet Union gave the Mossad-SAVAK intelligence axis access to collection opportunities against Soviet military and political activities that would have been impossible for Israel to achieve independently. Iran functioned as a critical listening post for both Israel and the CIA, and Israel's embedded relationship with SAVAK meant that intelligence of strategic value to Israel — particularly regarding Soviet arms transfers to Arab states — was shared in near real time.
V. Social and Humanitarian Benefits
Iran's Jewish Community as a Strategic Reservoir
Under the Shah, Iran's Jewish community — one of the largest outside Israel in the Middle East — enjoyed recognized minority status with protected rights, synagogues, Jewish schools, cultural institutions, and even parliamentary representation. Jewish Iranians played prominent roles in business, academia, medicine, and the arts. This security allowed Iranian Jews to serve as a cultural and commercial bridge between the two countries. Tehran's Jewish community also functioned as a transit hub: European Jewish refugees, Iraqi Jews, Afghan Jews, and others bound for Israel passed through Tehran's Jewish community while awaiting El Al flights to Israel.
Jewish Immigration (Aliyah) to Israel
Between 1948 and 1978, an estimated 70,000 Iranian Jews emigrated to Israel — a significant demographic contribution to the young state during its formative decades. The reign of the Shah following the 1953 restoration was described as "the most prosperous era for the Jews of Iran," providing stability that paradoxically both reduced push factors for emigration and allowed the community to serve as a reliable source of potential immigrants when conditions changed. After 1953, the relative safety of Iran's Jewish community also meant that Israel did not need to mount rescue operations — unlike in some Arab countries — preserving Israeli diplomatic and intelligence resources.
Israeli School in TehranThe expatriate Israeli community in Iran grew large enough to warrant the establishment of an Israeli school in Tehran — a visible symbol of the depth of people-to-people ties and the scale of the Israeli professional presence in the country. This community included military advisors, agricultural consultants, defense industry workers, and technical specialists, all benefiting from Iranian salaries and project revenues while deepening bilateral ties.
Humanitarian Cooperation: Earthquake Relief and Development
After a catastrophic earthquake struck the Qazvin region of northwestern Iran in September 1962, killing more than 12,000 people, Israel responded with immediate technical assistance. The Israeli planning team — including Arie "Lova" Eliav and other architects and engineers — arrived at Iranian invitation and developed a comprehensive regional rebuilding plan that was subsequently adopted with UN financing. Israeli company TAHAL led the long-term development of the Qazvin area into an agricultural powerhouse, creating irrigation systems and deep wells that transformed the region's economy. This soft-power engagement enhanced Israel's diplomatic standing and sustained the personal goodwill of senior Iranian officials toward Israeli expertise.
VI. Geopolitical and Strategic Benefits
Neutralizing a Key Front-Line Arab Threat (Iraq)
Iraq, which shared borders with both Iran and Israel's neighboring Arab states, was one of the most militarily capable and ideologically hostile Arab states Israel faced. Through the Iran alliance, Israel was able to keep Iraq strategically preoccupied on its western front — diverting Iraqi military resources away from potential operations against Israel. The joint support for Kurdish insurgencies in Iraq effectively pinned Iraqi army divisions in the north, reducing Baghdad's capacity to project force westward toward Israel.
Secure Red Sea and Shipping Lanes
The opening of the Tiran Straits in 1956 turned Eilat into a natural route for importing oil from Iran and eventually for shipping Iranian oil to Europe. The alliance with Iran required both countries to ensure the safety of these shipping routes, creating a shared naval and security interest in keeping the Red Sea and Gulf of Aqaba open. When Egypt sought to restrict Israeli shipping through the Straits of Tiran — a casus belli for the 1967 war — Israeli-Iranian coordination on maritime security served as an additional layer of protection for Israeli commerce.
Cold War Alignment Against Soviet-Backed Arab States
Both Israel and the Shah's Iran were firmly aligned with the West in the Cold War, creating a natural strategic convergence against Soviet-backed Arab regimes — particularly Nasser's Egypt, Baathist Syria, and Baathist Iraq. Israel benefited from Iran's role as a major US ally and regional gendarmerie, which kept Soviet influence from expanding further toward the Persian Gulf. The Shah's willingness to host American intelligence assets and maintain large-scale US military cooperation meant that the Western containment architecture in which Israel also operated was reinforced.
Insurance Against Total Arab Military Encirclement
Perhaps most strategically, the alliance with Iran gave Israel a friendly, powerful non-Arab state on the eastern flank of its Arab adversaries. At Israel's most vulnerable moments — before the 1967 Six-Day War when Arab states were mobilizing, and during the 1973 Yom Kippur War when Israel faced an existential two-front assault — Iran's continued oil supply, intelligence sharing, and diplomatic support provided essential strategic depth. Israel's encirclement was never total, as Iran's presence on the Arab world's eastern flank created strategic anxiety for Arab states contemplating a war against Israel.
Summary Table of Key Benefits
CategoryKey Benefit Significance Diplomatic De facto recognition (1950), ambassadors exchanged
Broke Muslim-world isolation
Diplomatic Periphery Doctrine anchor partner Strategic encirclement of Arab world
Diplomatic Access to U.S. influence via Shah's Washington ties Enhanced Israeli leverage in Washington
Energy Primary oil supplier (up to 60% of Israeli oil) Circumvented Arab oil boycott
Energy Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline (50/50 joint venture, 1968) Secure oil transit and European oil revenue
Economic Brisk bilateral trade, Israeli construction & industry in Iran Revenues and market for Israeli firms
Economic Major arms export customer (tens of millions in documented sales 1968–72+) Funded Israeli defense industrialization
Military Project Flower: ~$550M in Iranian cash + oil for missile R&D Financed Israeli missile program
Military IDF-Iranian armed forces daily coordination Enhanced IDF strategic planning
Intelligence Co-founded and shaped SAVAK Deep penetration of Iranian intelligence
Intelligence Mossad-SAVAK joint operations, intelligence sharing Regional situational awareness vs. Soviet/Arab threats
Intelligence Joint Kurdish operations against Iraq Weakened Baathist Iraq as a threat
Social Safe, large Iranian Jewish community (70,000 emigrants to Israel 1948–78) Sustained aliyah and commercial bridge
Humanitarian Qazvin earthquake reconstruction, agricultural development Soft-power and diplomatic goodwill
Geopolitical Iraq pinned on two fronts Reduced Arab military threat to Israel
Geopolitical Red Sea / Tiran Straits security cooperation Protected Israeli maritime tradeIntelligence AssessmentThe Shah–Israel alliance was arguably the single most beneficial bilateral relationship Israel cultivated in its first three decades, particularly because it was with a Muslim-majority state at a moment of near-total Arab hostility. Iran provided Israel with energy security, diplomatic recognition, intelligence depth, defense revenues, and strategic encirclement of its Arab enemies — benefits no other single partner provided simultaneously. The relationship's covert nature, while operationally necessary, also meant that much of its value was hidden from the Israeli public and from history until declassification of Israeli state archives in recent years. The abrupt end of this partnership with the 1979 Islamic Revolution remains one of the most consequential strategic reversals in the modern Middle East.Here is a comprehensive research report cataloguing every major category of benefit Israel derived from the Shah of Iran between 1953 and 1979. The report covers six dimensions:Diplomatic & Political — Iran's de facto recognition (2nd Muslim country to do so), the exchange of ambassadors, high-level meetings between Israeli PMs/Defense Ministers and the Shah, and Iran as the cornerstone of Ben-Gurion's "Periphery Doctrine" to break out of Arab isolationEconomic & Trade — Iran supplied up to 60% of Israel's oil and continued supplying it even during the 1973 Arab oil embargo; the jointly-owned 600,000 barrel/day Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline built in 1968; brisk bilateral trade with Israeli firms active across Iran; and massive arms sales (documented at tens of millions of dollars in the 1968–72 period alone)Military — Thousands of Israeli advisors trained the Iranian military; Iran funded Israel's missile research through Project Flower with an estimated $300 million in cash plus $250 million in oil; and joint IDF–Iranian general staff coordination on a daily basisIntelligence & Security — Mossad co-founded and shaped SAVAK (1957), giving Israel deep penetration of Iran's intelligence apparatus; joint covert operations against Iraq's Baathist regime in support of Kurdish insurgents; and real-time intelligence sharing on Soviet, Egyptian, and Iraqi military activitiesSocial & Humanitarian — Iran's protected Jewish community served as a commercial and demographic bridge; approximately 70,000 Iranian Jews emigrated to Israel between 1948–1978; and an Israeli school operated in Tehran for the large expatriate professional communityGeopolitical — Iraq was kept strategically preoccupied on its eastern front; Red Sea/Tiran Straits security was jointly protected; and Israel gained an eastern anchor against total Arab military encirclement throughout the Cold War
____________________________________________
But Jews do not know gratitude.
Their state is built on CRISIS MANAGEMENT.
The GOY is there to serve, to provide for free.
The Jewish religion from North Africa is a CULT.
The cult must have an all-knowing, indisputable ''dear leader:
BWANA ROTHSCHILDS.
BWANA ROTHSCHILDS.....is thinking and thinking.
He who must be obeyed.
Spastic inbred satanic octogenarian cretins, detached from reality.
Victor Rothschild was the puppet master of neo-liberal Maggie Thatcher (JD mission: destroy British industry, and elevate 'The City' with its banking and finance services--making the UK economy highly unstable, vulnerable and volatile to international crisis, such as COVID-19, and WAR of any kind, any where- so there is a security dimension), a Celtic meme with distant links to WALES/IRELAND, who started fake blond, and ended up a red head by the late 1980s.
As the most powerful man in the world/UK, he also ran the IRA through MI-5, which also happens to be Celtic. 1985 Brighton bombing, an IRA attempt to wipe out the British cabinet/government, with its high percentage of JEWS or as Tam Dyall refers to them, "a cabal of Jewish advisers".
Please tell me that the Rothschilds aren't anything but spastic cretin fuck ups.
Naturally, their soul mates and puppets must be just like them. Donald J Trump, a Celtic appearance from his father and mom. Satanic torturing and raping little boys and girls, eating their flesh, drinking their blood and gleefully celebrating it like a 12-year-old boy in the school playground, with EPSTEIN, again, again and again, since at least the 1980s in NY, AND ROY COHN.
CIA faggot Roy Marcus Cohn, who shaped and built Trump the cannibalistic monster, was an associate of Senator Joseph McCarthy.
Naturally, normal people would have nothing to do with such diabolical evil people.
You shake their hands, and you know that those are the very hands that killed innocent children.
The stench of satan and death on their body.
In the Rothschilds' psyops against me around the world, rarely if ever do I come across a Celtic face. My favourite teacher was Welsh, Mrs ROBERTSON, who steered me towards studying and away from sports, and put me at the top of the class, which, of course, I did not deserve. Beautiful full legs in a mini-skirt, and a voice like honey.
Sending Sir Jimmy Saville OBE MBE KCMG, an illiterate night club bouncer, to articulate very complex Middle East policies (1. make peace with Egypt--2. start backing Islamic terrorism-HAMAS, an Israeli creation from the 1970s, 3. October 7th false fag) in ISRAEL in 1975, is typical of Rothschild's behaviour.
Why not remove moderate pro-West regimes in the Middle East, and put in their place crazy Islamists to set the Middle East on fire and cause destabilisation?
1. To attack the Soviet Union with its 21% Muslim population.
2. Make Israel look pretty and in need of defence from the Islamic hordes.
Modern, white, privileged and a damsel in distress.
3. ''Arc of Crisis policy.''
4. Invite NATO intervention in the Greater Middle East to put out the fire. Crisis Management.
5. The 'Arc of CRISIS' policy was conveyed to Israel through Sir James Wilson Vincent Savile OBE, MBE...in the 1970s...' Jim'll Fix it', hows about that then kids.
During this visit, he met with the then-President of Israel, Ephraim Katzir. Savile, who was a British entertainer and broadcaster, described himself as "the most Jewish Catholic" and was known to support Zionist causes and fundraise for Jewish charities, such as Norwood.
Alegedly also met MENACHEM BEGIN, SHARED A BATH WITH HIM, with a very young Jewish girl. In Tel Aviv.
Precursor to Jeffrey Epstein, both created by the BWANA ROTHSCHILDS.
They put it out rather heavily that they are clever. That they are spunky, badass, smarter than everybody else, especially revolving around money, which, of course, is everything.
This makes us feel 'inferior,' lower, and inadequate compared to them.
Hollywood and TV, and the media generally.
A WASP can be dumb, a clown, a fool, stupid, idiotic, thoughtless and evil, but never them.
An African American can be a rap star, basketball player, walk strangely, Jive talk and peddle drugs along with Latinos, but never them.
BUT with such high IQ, why do they react like robots to BWANA ROTHSCHILDS IMPERIAL EDITS? Is it a glorified mafia organisation, with no free will?
No reflection
No circumspective reflection
No pondering
No consideration
No contemplation
NO MEDITATION
No observation
No counterintuitive opinion/argument/debate/views
No rumination
No deductive cognitive observation
No deliberation
No doubt/uncertainty/pensiveness
No speculation
No study of outcome
No worst-case scenarios.
1. When it was decided to betray the Shah, what consequences would there be of bringing mad mullahs to power in Iran? What results would there be in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and Palestine? Or was it a case of more Crisis Management; we'll muddle through somehow.
2. What about Bwana's Rothschilds with the HEGELIAN NAZI EXPERIMENT 1933-1945. Through BIS, and HALJMAR SCHACT. Incidental and irrelevant, and anyway most of the 6 million were ''Lessor BRETHREN'' from Eastern European, with funny Yiddish accents within the Jewish hierarchy.
3.
